An audience will read the media and take in this information, in most cases they are being fed this media by someone who is also taking an opinion on what they are speaking of. This opion tends to be valued by the audience and may be swayed by what is being said. The audience will make their own opinion but it is normaly created from the person feeding the information. Some people belive that viewers are driven by these media texts, e.g films and games, ‘The effects theory’. The effects thoery is basicly saying that the viewers are ’empty vessels’ and we shall consume the media and follow be example, thie thoery was developed in the 1920’s and now many people think it is out of date. Representation theory, a more recent theory which i think is a lot more accurate. This theory basicly means the the audience will play a part in how they comsume and interpret particular media. Its more about letting each individual viewer think for them selves, witch out a viewer it would have no meaning.
Media texts are polysemic, they may be read differently by different people depending on background, culture, identity, opinions.
Age
Teenagers that are representation in todays media, like Skins for example in my opinion aren’t meant to be taken seriously, the representations aren’t very accurate. And i agree with Stewart Lee, theses representations won’t comfort or give any confidence to teen age audiences but in the long run these characters never have happy endings. We as an audience are meant to be shown these characters lifes, we aren’t meant to want to be them. It’s an insight into how some probably a small majority live. The characters may appear to being living happy and conetent with being teenagers, but this is the surface. The characters all have depressing background drama, family problems ect. I think it’s hard to say that the producers/creaters are trying to represent teenagers, in my opinion i think they’ve just created a drama which works in the same ways soaps ans dramas for adults, but aimed in at teenagers using younger people. They’ve tried to make it look exciting to sell it, but then placed in the drama to add to the entertainment value.
Gender
Male masculinity has changed over the years, the good example used on blackpool media is the comparison between James Bond and The Bourne trilogy. In the 60’s the bond characters was a perfect example of how the males meant to be, now this is seen as outdated. 60’s men were Authorotive, composed and smooth, now this is seen as a past time and the idea of a male has changed. Disney takes on a very old stereo typical look at males and females, the male is always seen as masucline and the saviour. Strength and dominance is always very common. Disney focus strongly on hetrosexual relation ships between a hero and a heroine, disney movies tend to create the images that women are only their to serve men, or for pleasure. For young males this image will effect the way they see things as they grow older, the representations in my opnion are to innocent to effect young children. I think that these things have only been noticed by adults because we are cabable of thinking of this. Children on the other hand are young and see this for entertainment, i don’t think many are cabable to take note of these representations. Females in the 1950’s were expected to be glamorus and devoted complelty to domestic work, these representations have changed over time and women began to start working, the career women had started. The present day women are completly controlled by the media, magazines being the main culpurate. With image manipulation at such high standards it’s imposible to tell what exaclty is real and fake. Women are now veiwed as equals and more socialy free.
Male representation in the characters of ‘Bourne, Bond and disney males.’
The Bourne series creates a very common male representation, the mise en scene uses costume to make him look very average and normal, If this man was seen in real life you think twice about him being dangerous. The character has a good verisimilitude, where as compared to the Bond character it all seems very fictional and less believable. Jason Bourne in the very first shot is shown wearing a browny beige bland jacket. Where as compared to Bond his character doesn’t as real, the fighting seems unrealistic and the costume doesn’t fit with the cinema photography. Masculinity has a very strong appearance in the Bond character, he is shown wearing a dinner suit and fighting. These are 2 things that are very iconic with males, i think this is used to created the male representation.